Brown v Sydney Eye Hospital & Anor [2004] NSWSC 1112

The court held that only certain interrogatories were reasonably necessary for fair disposal of the matter and ordered defendants to answer those specified interrogatories. The remainder were dismissed as unnecessary or not related to matters in issue.

Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 22 November 2004
Procedural Posture: Professional Negligence / Interlocutory Application Regarding Interrogatories
Outcome: Partially granted; specified interrogatories to be answered, remainder dismissed.
Legal Topics: ['interrogatories' 'professional Negligence' 'personal Injury']

['tort Law' 'medical Negligence'] ['interrogatories' 'professional Negligence' 'personal Injury']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Procedural Posture

Professional Negligence / Interlocutory Application Regarding Interrogatories

Legal Issues

1 ["Whether the defendants should be ordered to answer specified interrogatories relevant to the plaintiff's claim of professional negligence" 'Whether the interrogatories sought are reasonably necessary for fair disposal of the matter']

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Partially granted; specified interrogatories to be answered, remainder dismissed.

Orders

['The first defendant is to answer interrogatories 5, 6, 7, 10, 12 and 15 as amended within 21 days.' 'The second defendant is to answer interrogatories 1, 16, 17, 26 and 27 within 21 days.' 'The balance of the notice of motion is dismissed.' 'Costs of the motion are costs in the cause.']