Hogan v Stebnicki [2022] NSWCATCD 63
No enforceable mediation agreement required Lot 3 Lot Owners to install carpet. The acoustic testing demonstrated compliance with minimum standards in By-Law 14, BCA, and DCP 2013. Noise transmission does not constitute nuisance or breach of By-Laws on an objective basis. The application was dismissed as applicants failed to prove a breach or entitlement to the order sought.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 June 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Strata Dispute – Application for Orders Under S 230(1) Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (nsw) / Principal Judgment – Final Order
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['strata by Laws' 'noise' 'floor Coverings' 'peaceful Enjoyment' 'objective Test']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Strata Dispute – Application for Orders Under S 230(1) Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (nsw) / Principal Judgment – Final Order
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Lot 3 Lot Owners failed to comply with mediation agreements regarding installation of carpet and underlay' 'Whether noise transmission from Lot 3 to Lot 2 constitutes a breach of By-Laws 1 and 14' 'Whether the Lot 2 Lot Owners are entitled to an order requiring carpet installation with a 5 Star acoustic rating']
Ratio Decidendi
No enforceable mediation agreement required Lot 3 Lot Owners to install carpet. The acoustic testing demonstrated compliance with minimum standards in By-Law 14, BCA, and DCP 2013. Noise transmission does not constitute nuisance or breach of By-Laws on an objective basis. The application was dismissed as applicants failed to prove a breach or entitlement to the order sought.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- ['The application is dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment