Crimmins v. Glenview Home Units Pty Ltd and Anor [2001] NSWSC 699

Crimmins v. Glenview Home Units Pty Ltd and Anor [2001] NSWSC 699

The directors' opinion that the company was likely to become insolvent was formed both genuinely and in good faith, with appropriate consideration of probable and foreseeable liabilities and following legal and financial advice. The appointment of the administrator and subsequent winding up were therefore valid. There were no improprieties or procedural flaws invalidating the resolution or the appointments.

Parties
Plaintiff: Patricia Louise Crimmins; First Defendant: Glenview Home Units Pty Ltd (In liquidation); Second Defendant: Manfred Holzman
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
17 August 2001
Procedural Posture
Equity / Final Hearing of Originating Process
Outcome
Plaintiff's application refused. Appointment of administrator and subsequent winding up held valid.
Legal Topics
Voluntary Administration, Winding Up, Directors' Duties, Company Title, Solvency, Appointment of Administrator
Corporations Equity Voluntary Administration Winding Up Directors' Duties Company Title Solvency Appointment of Administrator

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 15
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Patricia Louise Crimmins

Plaintiff

Glenview Home Units Pty Ltd (In liquidation)

First Defendant

Manfred Holzman

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Equity / Final Hearing of Originating Process

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appointment of administrator under s.436A Corporations Law was valid
  2. 2 Whether the resolution to appoint administrator was properly formed
  3. 3 Whether winding up should be stayed

Ratio Decidendi

The directors' opinion that the company was likely to become insolvent was formed both genuinely and in good faith, with appropriate consideration of probable and foreseeable liabilities and following legal and financial advice. The appointment of the administrator and subsequent winding up were therefore valid. There were no improprieties or procedural flaws invalidating the resolution or the appointments.

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's application refused. Appointment of administrator and subsequent winding up held valid.

Orders

  • The plaintiff's claims in paragraphs 1A to 4 of the Further Amended Originating Process are dismissed.
  • The plaintiff is to pay the defendants' costs of the proceedings to date.