Ehsman v Nutectime [2009] NSWSC 909
Leave to amend pleadings to raise fraud at the commencement of trial was refused due to unexplained delay in raising the issue, the potential for prejudice and adjournment, and the requirements of effective case management per recent High Court authority.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 August 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Procedural and Other Rulings / Application to Amend Pleadings at Commencement of Trial
- Outcome
- Application refused with liberty to reapply if defendants did not need an adjournment.
- Legal Topics
- ['amendment of Pleadings' 'case Management' 'adjournment' 'fraud Allegation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Procedural and Other Rulings / Application to Amend Pleadings at Commencement of Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave should be granted to amend pleadings to raise allegations of fraud at the commencement of a trial' 'Whether delay in raising fraud allegations is excusable' 'Whether allowance of amendments may cause a need for adjournment']
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to amend pleadings to raise fraud at the commencement of trial was refused due to unexplained delay in raising the issue, the potential for prejudice and adjournment, and the requirements of effective case management per recent High Court authority.
Court Disposition
Application refused with liberty to reapply if defendants did not need an adjournment.
Orders
- ['Amendments to paragraphs 70A and 73A to 73E of the statement of claim disallowed, with liberty to reapply during the trial if defendants can address the matter on existing evidence.' 'Other amendments to the statement of claim allowed.' 'Amendments to the defence to first cross-claim disallowed, with liberty to...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment