Patricia Panico v Carolyn Crompton and Rodney Jennings [2015] NSWCATAP 110
Leave to appeal was refused and the appeal dismissed as the evidence before the Tribunal provided a proper basis for the conclusion that the damage to the front door and surrounds was not caused by the tenants' actions, but by age and water damage, and no substantial miscarriage of justice was demonstrated.
- Parties
- Appellant: Patricia Panico; Respondent: Carolyn Crompton; Respondent: Rodney Jennings
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 June 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Leave to Appeal and Final Appeal Disposition
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal refused; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Landlord's Repair Obligations, Tenant's Liability for Repairs, Fair Wear and Tear, Leave to Appeal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Patricia Panico
Appellant
Carolyn Crompton
Respondent
Rodney Jennings
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Leave to Appeal and Final Appeal Disposition
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal erred in declining to award compensation to the landlord for repairs to the front door and its surrounds
- 2 Whether leave to appeal should be granted due to a substantial miscarriage of justice
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal was refused and the appeal dismissed as the evidence before the Tribunal provided a proper basis for the conclusion that the damage to the front door and surrounds was not caused by the tenants' actions, but by age and water damage, and no substantial miscarriage of justice was demonstrated.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal refused; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- Leave to appeal is refused.
- The appeal is otherwise dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment