Patrick Badges Pty Ltd v Commonwealth of Australia (No. 2) [2002] NSWSC 269
The usual rule that costs follow the event should be applied where a motion to transfer proceedings is successful, unless there are special circumstances; the existence of a contractual jurisdiction clause favouring the transferee court supports the transfer, and there is no justification shown here for departing...
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 April 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Costs Incident to Transfer of Proceedings / Post Transfer, Costs Order
- Outcome
- Plaintiff to pay defendant's costs of the motion; all other costs to be the costs in the transferred proceedings.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs' 'transfer of Proceedings' 'cross Vesting Legislation']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Costs Incident to Transfer of Proceedings / Post Transfer, Costs Order
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Appropriate order for costs where proceedings are transferred under Cross-Vesting legislation']
Ratio Decidendi
The usual rule that costs follow the event should be applied where a motion to transfer proceedings is successful, unless there are special circumstances; the existence of a contractual jurisdiction clause favouring the transferee court supports the transfer, and there is no justification shown here for departing from the normal rule on costs.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff to pay defendant's costs of the motion; all other costs to be the costs in the transferred proceedings.
Orders
- ['Costs in the proceedings to date, other than the costs of the motion, be the costs in the transferred proceedings.' "The plaintiff pay the defendant's costs of the motion."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment