Patrick John Bredel v Moore Business Systems Australia Ltd [2002] NSWSC 185
The plaintiff's entitlement to 4% commission was limited to 1998, as expressly stated in the 25 March 1998 remuneration memo and confirmed by oral evidence. There was no evidence supporting entitlement to such commission for the life of the relevant contracts. The defendant's remuneration plans were subject to annual review. Any alleged assurance was too vague to form a binding contractual term. Estoppel claim failed as the evidence did not support detrimental reliance sufficient to bind the defendant to pay 4% commission for the life of the contracts.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Patrick John Bredel; Defendant: Moore Business Systems Australia Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 March 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Summons dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Contractual Terms, Remuneration, Estoppel, Employment Contracts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Patrick John Bredel
Plaintiff
Moore Business Systems Australia Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff was entitled to 4% commission on incremental sales 'for the life' of certain contracts with the defendant
- 2 Whether the defendant was estopped from denying the plaintiff's entitlement to commission
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff's entitlement to 4% commission was limited to 1998, as expressly stated in the 25 March 1998 remuneration memo and confirmed by oral evidence. There was no evidence supporting entitlement to such commission for the life of the relevant contracts. The defendant's remuneration plans were subject to annual review. Any alleged assurance was too vague to form a binding contractual term. Estoppel claim failed as the evidence did not support detrimental reliance sufficient to bind the defendant to pay 4% commission for the life of the contracts.
Court Disposition
Summons dismissed
Orders
- Summons dismissed
- Court will hear argument on costs if parties cannot agree
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment