Dadey v Edith Cowan University [1996] IRCA 585
The application was dismissed because the respondent's objection that there was no termination of Mr Dadey's services at the initiative of the employer was upheld for the reasons given in Fisher v Edith Cowan University.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 November 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Unlawful Termination Application Concerning Fixed Term Employment / Review on Preliminary Objections
- Outcome
- Application dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['unlawful Termination' 'fixed Term Contracts' 'contract for a Specified Period' 'termination at the Initiative of the Employer' 'award Right to Resign']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Unlawful Termination Application Concerning Fixed Term Employment / Review on Preliminary Objections
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether there was a termination of Mr Dadey's services at the initiative of the employer." 'Whether Mr Dadey was engaged under a contract of employment entered into before 16 November 1994 for a specified period of time and therefore excluded from the operation of the Industrial Relations Act 1988 (Cth) pursuant to s 170cc and Reg 30B of the Industrial Relations Regulations.' "Whether an employee's award right to resign on notice prevents a fixed-term employment contract from being a contract for a specified period of time within Reg 30B(1)(a)."]
Ratio Decidendi
The application was dismissed because the respondent's objection that there was no termination of Mr Dadey's services at the initiative of the employer was upheld for the reasons given in Fisher v Edith Cowan University.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed.
Orders
- ['The application be dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment