Cusack v Commissioner of Taxation [2002] FCA 1012
There is only one form of Australian currency for purposes of taxation and discharge of monetary obligations, and no basis in law for the applicant's contention of two currencies with different values. The assessments were properly made in Australian currency, and no legal error occurred in the AAT's affirmation of the respondent's decision.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 August 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Extension of Time to Appeal / Determination of Application to Extend Time for Review of Administrative Appeals Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- The application to extend time to apply for review of the AAT decision is dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['assessable Income' 'notices of Assessment' 'legal Tender' 'administrative Review' 'extension of Time Applications']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time to Appeal / Determination of Application to Extend Time for Review of Administrative Appeals Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether there are two distinct forms of Australian currency with different exchange values for tax purposes' 'Whether tax assessments were void or excessive for uncertainty based on alleged different currencies' "Whether the applicant is entitled to have income and liability expressed in 'high value' Australian dollars"]
Ratio Decidendi
There is only one form of Australian currency for purposes of taxation and discharge of monetary obligations, and no basis in law for the applicant's contention of two currencies with different values. The assessments were properly made in Australian currency, and no legal error occurred in the AAT's affirmation of the respondent's decision.
Court Disposition
The application to extend time to apply for review of the AAT decision is dismissed.
Orders
- ['The application to extend time to apply for review of the decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal given on 16 March 2001 is dismissed.' "The applicant pay the respondent's costs, including reserved costs, to be taxed if not agreed."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment