Curtis v Dimitriou [2012] FCA 604
In the present circumstances, a sequestration order should be made as the respondent has not appealed, set aside, or satisfied a current judgment debt. The existence of pending or contemplated litigation and asserted assets does not suffice to prevent the making of a sequestration order.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 May 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Creditor's Petition for Sequestration Order / Judgment and Orders Granted
- Outcome
- Sequestration order granted against the estate of Georgina Dimitriou; applicant creditor's costs to be taxed and paid from the estate.
- Legal Topics
- ['sequestration Order' 'act of Bankruptcy' "creditor's Petition" 'outstanding Judgment Debt']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Creditor's Petition for Sequestration Order / Judgment and Orders Granted
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether a sequestration order should be made against the estate of Georgina Dimitriou' 'Whether pending litigation or asserted counter-claims constitute grounds not to make a sequestration order']
Ratio Decidendi
In the present circumstances, a sequestration order should be made as the respondent has not appealed, set aside, or satisfied a current judgment debt. The existence of pending or contemplated litigation and asserted assets does not suffice to prevent the making of a sequestration order.
Court Disposition
Sequestration order granted against the estate of Georgina Dimitriou; applicant creditor's costs to be taxed and paid from the estate.
Orders
- ['A sequestration order be made against the estate of Georgina Dimitriou.' "The applicant creditor's costs be taxed and paid from the estate of the respondent debtor in accordance with the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth)."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment