Paul Anthony Hayes v Leichhardt Municipal Council [2011] NSWLEC 1188
The proposed development is of excessive bulk and scale in the prevailing context, fails to satisfy relevant qualitative and heritage objectives even if numerically compliant, and should be modified with a setback to the upper level before consent may be considered.
- Parties
- Applicant: Paul Anthony Hayes; Respondent: Leichhardt Municipal Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 July 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Preliminary Findings
- Outcome
- Preliminary findings made; applicant allowed three weeks to consider and advise regarding amendments before final orders.
- Legal Topics
- Development Application, Terrace House Extension, Bulk and Scale, Rear Building Location Zone (blz), Conservation Area, Heritage, Development Controls, Precedent
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Paul Anthony Hayes
Applicant
Leichhardt Municipal Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Preliminary Findings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed development is of excessive bulk and scale
- 2 Compliance with the rear Building Location Zone (BLZ)
- 3 Compliance with side setback controls
Ratio Decidendi
The proposed development is of excessive bulk and scale in the prevailing context, fails to satisfy relevant qualitative and heritage objectives even if numerically compliant, and should be modified with a setback to the upper level before consent may be considered.
Court Disposition
Preliminary findings made; applicant allowed three weeks to consider and advise regarding amendments before final orders.
Orders
- Applicant is allowed three weeks until 29 July 2011 to consider findings and advise Council and Court whether it wishes to make minor amendments before final orders are made.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment