McNamara v San (No. 3) [2010] FCA 227
Applicant lacks standing to bring proceedings under sections 120 and/or 121 of the Bankruptcy Act or for declaratory relief regarding trustee rights; only trustees may bring such actions. The application has no reasonable prospect of success and must be dismissed under section 31A(2) of the Federal Court Act.
- Parties
- Applicant: Paul Anthony McNamara; First Respondent: Bao San; Second Respondent: Julie San; Third Respondent: Ivan San; Fourth Respondent: Official Trustee in Bankruptcy; Fifth Respondent: Schon Gregory Condon
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 March 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Proceeding / Summary Dismissal Application
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Standing of Creditor, Relief Under Bankruptcy Act, Summary Dismissal, Leave to Continue Proceedings Under Conveyancing Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Paul Anthony McNamara
Applicant
Bao San
First Respondent
Julie San
Second Respondent
Ivan San
Third Respondent
Official Trustee in Bankruptcy
Fourth Respondent
Schon Gregory Condon
Fifth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Proceeding / Summary Dismissal Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the applicant have standing to seek relief under sections 120 and 121 of the Bankruptcy Act?
- 2 Is the applicant entitled to declaratory relief regarding trustee rights under sections 120 and 121?
- 3 Should leave be granted to continue Supreme Court proceedings under section 37A of the Conveyancing Act after transferors' bankruptcy?
Ratio Decidendi
Applicant lacks standing to bring proceedings under sections 120 and/or 121 of the Bankruptcy Act or for declaratory relief regarding trustee rights; only trustees may bring such actions. The application has no reasonable prospect of success and must be dismissed under section 31A(2) of the Federal Court Act.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Amended Further Amended Application filed 12 February 2010 be dismissed.
- Applicant to pay costs of third respondent, fourth respondent, and fifth respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment