Goldberg v Waverley Council [2008] NSWLEC 49
Consent was granted for demolition and subdivision, as the applicant satisfied planning principles and environmental impacts were negligible, but consent for construction of the driveway was refused due to unresolved and significant public safety issues for pedestrians and vehicles despite the legal permissibility of road use under the LEP.
- Parties
- Applicant: Paul Anton Goldberg; Respondent: Waverley Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 March 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Development Application Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed in part; development consent for demolition and subdivision granted; consent for driveway refused
- Legal Topics
- Development Application, Subdivision, Road Construction, Environmental Impact, Public Safety
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Paul Anton Goldberg
Applicant
Waverley Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Development Application Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether construction of a driveway on a public road for private access is permissible under the relevant planning controls
- 2 Whether subdivision of the land is acceptable under planning principles given geotechnical and visual impacts
- 3 Whether the proposed driveway design raises unresolved public safety concerns warranting refusal
Ratio Decidendi
Consent was granted for demolition and subdivision, as the applicant satisfied planning principles and environmental impacts were negligible, but consent for construction of the driveway was refused due to unresolved and significant public safety issues for pedestrians and vehicles despite the legal permissibility of road use under the LEP.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed in part; development consent for demolition and subdivision granted; consent for driveway refused
Orders
- The appeal is allowed in part.
- Development consent is granted to the demolition of the existing dwelling house at No. 362 Birrell Street, Tamarama, being lot A in deposited plan 37266 and for subdivision of that property in accordance with plan of subdivision prepared by Rygate and Company dated 2 September 2005, subject to conditions.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment