Hand v Brown [2021] NSWCATAP 228
The rental bond, paid from the parties' joint property for their joint benefit, should be divided equally between them in the absence of evidence showing a different intention; the Tribunal erred as a matter of law in finding otherwise.
- Parties
- Appellant: Paul Christopher Hand; Respondent: Simone Louise Brown
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 July 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Hearing and Determination of Internal Appeal in Appeal Panel
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed. Orders below set aside. Partial award to respondent only.
- Legal Topics
- Error of Law, Residential Tenancies Act 2010 (nsw), Rental Bonds, Payment and Release, Entitlement to Bond by Co Tenants
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Paul Christopher Hand
Appellant
Simone Louise Brown
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Hearing and Determination of Internal Appeal in Appeal Panel
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Tribunal erred in awarding whole rental bond to one co-tenant given bond was paid from joint property for joint benefit
- 2 Whether source of money for payment of bond is determinative of entitlement between co-tenants
- 3 Whether procedural fairness was denied by late/non-disclosure of documents
Ratio Decidendi
The rental bond, paid from the parties' joint property for their joint benefit, should be divided equally between them in the absence of evidence showing a different intention; the Tribunal erred as a matter of law in finding otherwise.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed. Orders below set aside. Partial award to respondent only.
Orders
- The appeal is allowed.
- Set aside order 1 made by the Tribunal on 29 April 2021.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment