Westwood, Paul Denison v Australian Federal Police Promotions Appeal Board & Anor [1983] FCA 221
Section 74(1) of the Australian Federal Police Act does not operate to preserve, for transitional members, prior qualifications and eligibility for promotion to higher ranks established under earlier police legislation; instead, promotion qualifications are determined according to the Act and regulations operative after commencement.
- Parties
- Applicant: Paul Denison Westwood; First Respondent: Australian Federal Police Promotions Appeal Board; Second Respondent: The Commissioner of Police
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 September 1983
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment After Hearing
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Statutory Construction, Transitional Provisions, Qualifications for Police Promotion
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Paul Denison Westwood
Applicant
Australian Federal Police Promotions Appeal Board
First Respondent
The Commissioner of Police
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the qualifications for promotion altered by the Australian Federal Police Act and its regulations validly applied to the applicant, overriding the terms and conditions existing under the repealed legislation
- 2 Whether transitional provisions of the Australian Federal Police Act preserved the applicant's prior qualifications for promotion
Ratio Decidendi
Section 74(1) of the Australian Federal Police Act does not operate to preserve, for transitional members, prior qualifications and eligibility for promotion to higher ranks established under earlier police legislation; instead, promotion qualifications are determined according to the Act and regulations operative after commencement.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- The application is dismissed.
- The applicant pay the costs of the respondents.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment