Ekes v Hyde Page (No 3) [2019] NSWCA 179

Ekes v Hyde Page (No 3) [2019] NSWCA 179

The oral application for a 14-day adjournment was refused due to lack of satisfactory explanation and prior confirmation of material adequacy after close case management.

Parties
Applicant: Paul Ekes; First Respondent: GHS Safety Products Australia Pty Limited (in liq); Second Respondent: John Hyde Page
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
09 July 2019
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Application for Adjournment in Court of Appeal
Outcome
Application for adjournment refused
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal, Adjournment
Civil Procedure Leave to Appeal Adjournment

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Paul Ekes

Applicant

GHS Safety Products Australia Pty Limited (in liq)

First Respondent

John Hyde Page

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Appeal / Application for Adjournment in Court of Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether an oral application for an adjournment should be granted during a leave to appeal hearing

Ratio Decidendi

The oral application for a 14-day adjournment was refused due to lack of satisfactory explanation and prior confirmation of material adequacy after close case management.

Court Disposition

Application for adjournment refused

Orders

  • Oral application for adjournment refused