Application of Paul Geoffrey Mason [2022] NSWSC 808
The evidence demonstrated that the plaintiff and Nicholas Mason intended that the plaintiff be a beneficiary of the trust at the time of its creation; the omission from the Trust Deed was inadvertent and inconsistent with their intentions. The Trust Deed should therefore be rectified to include the plaintiff as a beneficiary.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Paul Geoffrey Mason
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 June 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Rectification of Trust Deed / Principal Judgment
- Outcome
- Deed rectified to include Paul Geoffrey Mason as a beneficiary.
- Legal Topics
- Trusts and Trustees, Rectification of Trust Deed
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Paul Geoffrey Mason
Plaintiff
Procedural Posture
Application for Rectification of Trust Deed / Principal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Trust Deed correctly recorded the intention of the parties regarding the plaintiff as a beneficiary
- 2 Whether rectification of the trust deed is warranted based on the parties' intentions
Ratio Decidendi
The evidence demonstrated that the plaintiff and Nicholas Mason intended that the plaintiff be a beneficiary of the trust at the time of its creation; the omission from the Trust Deed was inadvertent and inconsistent with their intentions. The Trust Deed should therefore be rectified to include the plaintiff as a beneficiary.
Court Disposition
Deed rectified to include Paul Geoffrey Mason as a beneficiary.
Orders
- Order that the Deed entitled the 'Paul Mason Family Settlement' made as between Nicholas Mason (settlor) and Paul Geoffrey Mason (trustee) dated 2 July 1973 be rectified so that the definition of 'Beneficiaries' as contained in clause 1(c) includes at new paragraph 1(c)(vi) the words: '(vi) Paul Geoffrey Mason.'
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment