Lane, Paul Gregory v The Queen [1996] FCA 385

Lane, Paul Gregory v The Queen [1996] FCA 385

There was no statutory or common law requirement for the trial judge to warn or direct the jury regarding the lack of corroboration or unreliability of the complainant's evidence, and the evidence did not lack probative force so as to necessitate intervention; the appeal was dismissed as no miscarriage of justice was demonstrated.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
16 May 1996
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
['sexual Offences' 'jury Directions' 'corroboration' 'unreliable Evidence' 'delay in Complaint']
['criminal Law'] ['sexual Offences' 'jury Directions' 'corroboration' 'unreliable Evidence' 'delay in Complaint']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal From Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['whether the verdict was unsafe or unsatisfactory' 'whether warnings or directions ought to have been given regarding uncorroborated evidence' "whether the complainant's evidence required corroboration or warning as unreliable" 'relevance of delay in complaint']

Ratio Decidendi

There was no statutory or common law requirement for the trial judge to warn or direct the jury regarding the lack of corroboration or unreliability of the complainant's evidence, and the evidence did not lack probative force so as to necessitate intervention; the appeal was dismissed as no miscarriage of justice was demonstrated.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • ['The appeal be dismissed.']