Hill v Compass Ten Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 761

Hill v Compass Ten Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 761

The Court has no jurisdiction to determine Mr Hill's claim under s 340 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) because he failed to obtain the requisite s 369 certificate. The emails sent by Mr Hill to the Department did not amount to a 'complaint' within s 772(1)(e) as they did not articulate a grievance or particular issue, thus summary judgment is appropriate in relation to this aspect of the unlawful termination claim. The breach of contract claim raises factual disputes inappropriate for determination on summary judgment and should proceed.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
17 July 2012
Procedural Posture
Employment/industrial Law / Interlocutory Application – Strike Out and Summary Judgment
Outcome
Application allowed in part
Legal Topics
['adverse Action' 'unlawful Termination' 'summary Judgment' 'strike Out Pleadings']
['employment Law'] ['adverse Action' 'unlawful Termination' 'summary Judgment' 'strike Out Pleadings']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Employment/industrial Law / Interlocutory Application – Strike Out and Summary Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Court has jurisdiction to hear a general protections court application absent a s 369 certificate under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth)' "Whether emails sent by the applicant to the Department constituted a 'complaint' under s 772(1)(e) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth)" "Whether summary judgment should be granted on the applicant's breach of contract claim"]

Ratio Decidendi

The Court has no jurisdiction to determine Mr Hill's claim under s 340 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) because he failed to obtain the requisite s 369 certificate. The emails sent by Mr Hill to the Department did not amount to a 'complaint' within s 772(1)(e) as they did not articulate a grievance or particular issue, thus summary judgment is appropriate in relation to this aspect of the unlawful termination claim. The breach of contract claim raises factual disputes inappropriate for determination on summary judgment and should proceed.

Court Disposition

Application allowed in part

Orders

  • ['Application allowed in part' 'Designated paragraphs of the statement of claim struck out under r 16.21 of the Federal Court Rules 2011' 'No order as to costs']