Barratt v Howard [2000] FCA 190
Procedural fairness applies to the termination of Secretaries under s 37(5) of the Public Service Act 1922 (Cth), requiring that the Secretary be informed of the grounds for the proposed recommendation and given a reasonable opportunity to respond. Termination need not be limited to situations of proven fault or incapacity; a Minister's loss of trust and confidence, if grounded in the statutory purpose of efficient and proper administration, is a sufficient basis. There is no requirement in the statute or by procedural fairness to provide further particulars beyond the notice of such grounds.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 March 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From a Single Judge of the Federal Court of Australia
- Outcome
- Appeals dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['procedural Fairness' 'natural Justice' 'termination of Public Office' 'fixed Term Appointments' 'ministerial Trust and Confidence' 'statutory Interpretation' 'legitimate Expectation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From a Single Judge of the Federal Court of Australia
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether procedural fairness is required before terminating the appointment of a Secretary under the Public Service Act 1922 (Cth) s 37' "Whether termination requires proof of fault, incapacity, or other 'cause shown' on the Secretary's part" 'Whether a general loss of ministerial trust and confidence is a sufficient ground for termination under the Act' 'Whether Mr Barratt was entitled to further particulars of the assertion that the Minister had lost trust and confidence in him']
Ratio Decidendi
Procedural fairness applies to the termination of Secretaries under s 37(5) of the Public Service Act 1922 (Cth), requiring that the Secretary be informed of the grounds for the proposed recommendation and given a reasonable opportunity to respond. Termination need not be limited to situations of proven fault or incapacity; a Minister's loss of trust and confidence, if grounded in the statutory purpose of efficient and proper administration, is a sufficient basis. There is no requirement in the statute or by procedural fairness to provide further particulars beyond the notice of such grounds.
Court Disposition
Appeals dismissed
Orders
- ['The appeals be dismissed.' "The appellant pay the respondents' costs of the appeals."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment