Regina v Webb [2004] NSWCCA 330
The sentencing judge did not err in declining to treat the period on bail as warranting a reduction in sentence, made an appropriate discount for the utilitarian value of the guilty plea, took proper account of extra curial punishment, and the sentence imposed was not manifestly excessive considering the seriousness of the offences and relevant mitigating and aggravating factors.
- Parties
- Crown: Regina; Applicant: Paul John Webb
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 September 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence; Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Sentence, Possession of Prohibited Weapons, Malicious Damage to Property, Drug Induced Psychosis, Mitigation, Extra Curial Punishment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Crown
Paul John Webb
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence; Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether sentencing judge erred in not making allowance for restrictive bail conditions
- 2 Whether sentencing judge erred in the allowance for utilitarian value of guilty plea
- 3 Whether sentence is manifestly excessive
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge did not err in declining to treat the period on bail as warranting a reduction in sentence, made an appropriate discount for the utilitarian value of the guilty plea, took proper account of extra curial punishment, and the sentence imposed was not manifestly excessive considering the seriousness of the offences and relevant mitigating and aggravating factors.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Leave to appeal granted but appeal against sentence dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment