R v Cornwell [2016] NSWSC 767
Although there were legitimate concerns about the applicant's appearance, possible offending on bail, and community safety, those risks did not rise to an unacceptable risk under s 19 when assessed against the s 18 considerations, including serious factual issues in the Crown case, the applicant's Huntington's disease and special needs, community ties, likely remand time, and the availability of stringent conditions including daily reporting.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 June 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Bail Application / Bail Application
- Outcome
- Bail granted with conditions.
- Legal Topics
- ['bail' 'unacceptable Risk' 'show Cause Offences' 'sexual Intercourse Without Consent' 'assault With Act of Indecency' 'resisting Police' "huntington's Disease"]
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Bail Application / Bail Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether bail concerns as to non-appearance, commission of a serious offence, community safety, and interfering with witnesses gave rise to an unacceptable risk.' 'Whether any risks could be managed by bail conditions.' "Whether the strength of the prosecution case and the applicant's Huntington's disease affected the assessment of risk."]
Ratio Decidendi
Although there were legitimate concerns about the applicant's appearance, possible offending on bail, and community safety, those risks did not rise to an unacceptable risk under s 19 when assessed against the s 18 considerations, including serious factual issues in the Crown case, the applicant's Huntington's disease and special needs, community ties, likely remand time, and the availability of stringent conditions including daily reporting.
Court Disposition
Bail granted with conditions.
Orders
- ['Bail granted with conditions.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment