Chang v Productivity Commission [2000] FCA 1295
The application was dismissed because the applicant failed to provide security as previously ordered, consistent with prior submissions and the interests of justice.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 September 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Application / Judgment and Orders
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- []
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Application / Judgment and Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the application should be dismissed for failure to provide security as previously ordered']
Ratio Decidendi
The application was dismissed because the applicant failed to provide security as previously ordered, consistent with prior submissions and the interests of justice.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- ['The application is dismissed.' "The applicant pay the respondents' costs of today."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment