Owen v R [2017] NSWCCA 54
The sentencing judge comprehensively considered all relevant circumstances including the applicant’s role, planning, seriousness, history, motivation, and the principle of totality. The sentences, though stern, properly reflected the substantial criminality and were not manifestly excessive. Leave to appeal was granted but appeal dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 March 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentence Appeal / Leave to Appeal and Substantive Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal against sentence granted; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'drug Offences' 'firearms Offences']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence Appeal / Leave to Appeal and Substantive Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Was the sentence imposed manifestly excessive?' 'Did the judge properly consider all relevant sentencing issues, including objective seriousness, subjective circumstances, motivation, and principle of totality?']
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge comprehensively considered all relevant circumstances including the applicant’s role, planning, seriousness, history, motivation, and the principle of totality. The sentences, though stern, properly reflected the substantial criminality and were not manifestly excessive. Leave to appeal was granted but appeal dismissed.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal against sentence granted; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal against sentence granted; appeal dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment