Gray v Watts [2007] NSWLEC 865
Applications for removal of three trees dismissed as there was insufficient evidence they had caused or were likely to cause damage or injury, and compensation for barbecue and slab damage to be shared based on three quotes, with cheapest not exceeding $1507.00, paid 50:50.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 December 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Neighbour Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- Partial dismissal; partial grant of relief
- Legal Topics
- ['trees (neighbours)' 'removal of Trees' 'damage to Property' 'injury to Persons']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Neighbour Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the removal of four trees on adjoining property is justified under s 7 of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 due to alleged damage to property and risk of injury' 'Entitlement to compensation for alleged damage caused by tree roots to barbecue and concrete slab']
Ratio Decidendi
Applications for removal of three trees dismissed as there was insufficient evidence they had caused or were likely to cause damage or injury, and compensation for barbecue and slab damage to be shared based on three quotes, with cheapest not exceeding $1507.00, paid 50:50.
Court Disposition
Partial dismissal; partial grant of relief
Orders
- ['Application to remove Camphor Laurel dismissed' 'Application to remove Cypress dismissed' 'Application to remove most westerly pine dismissed' "All branches overhanging applicants' property from pine closest to applicants to be removed by AQF level 3 Arborist at respondent's expense within 90 days" 'Applicants to...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment