Barach v The University of New South Wales [2011] NSWSC 1327
Plaintiff is granted leave to file and serve the Second Amended Statement of Claim, subject to deletion of particulars K and L in paragraph 109 and paragraphs 143-145. Extension of limitation period under section 56A Limitation Act 1969 is granted for the eighteenth matter complained of due to plaintiff's lack of knowledge of publication within 12 months. Certain pleading objections are dismissed; additional causes of action and representations by silence are arguable and not struck out.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Paul Randall Barach; First Defendant: The University of New South Wales; Second Defendant: Professor Raphael Hilary Grzebieta; Third Defendant: Professor Ann Williamson; Fourth Defendant: Associate Professor Andrew McIntosh; Fifth Defendant: David Michael Ward; Sixth Defendant: Professor Richard Henry; Seventh Defendant: Harold Karaka; Eighth Defendant: Lori Mooren
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 November 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Application for Leave to Amend Statement of Claim and Extension of Limitation Period
- Outcome
- Leave granted to file and serve Second Amended Statement of Claim with deletions; extension of limitation period granted for eighteenth matter; further orders on costs to be heard.
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Limitation Period, Pleading Amendments, Misleading and Deceptive Conduct, Breach of Employment Contract, Vicarious Liability, Particulars of Pleading, Security for Costs, Discovery and Use of Documents
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Paul Randall Barach
Plaintiff
The University of New South Wales
First Defendant
Professor Raphael Hilary Grzebieta
Second Defendant
Professor Ann Williamson
Third Defendant
Associate Professor Andrew McIntosh
Fourth Defendant
David Michael Ward
Fifth Defendant
Professor Richard Henry
Sixth Defendant
Harold Karaka
Seventh Defendant
Lori Mooren
Eighth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Application for Leave to Amend Statement of Claim and Extension of Limitation Period
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether plaintiff should have leave to file Second Amended Statement of Claim with additional causes of action
- 2 Whether extension of time should be granted under section 56A Limitation Act 1969 for eighteenth matter
- 3 Whether certain particulars/paragraphs should be struck out as confusing or irrelevant
Ratio Decidendi
Plaintiff is granted leave to file and serve the Second Amended Statement of Claim, subject to deletion of particulars K and L in paragraph 109 and paragraphs 143-145. Extension of limitation period under section 56A Limitation Act 1969 is granted for the eighteenth matter complained of due to plaintiff's lack of knowledge of publication within 12 months. Certain pleading objections are dismissed; additional causes of action and representations by silence are arguable and not struck out.
Court Disposition
Leave granted to file and serve Second Amended Statement of Claim with deletions; extension of limitation period granted for eighteenth matter; further orders on costs to be heard.
Orders
- Plaintiff given leave to file and serve Second Amended Statement of Claim, subject to deletion of particulars K and L in paragraph 109, and paragraphs 143-145.
- Second Amended Statement of Claim to be filed and served by 5.00pm on 21 November 2011.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment