R v Harrison [2002] NSWCCA 198

R v Harrison [2002] NSWCCA 198

The sentences imposed were within discretionary limits and not excessive, given the gravity of the offences and the circumstances taken into account, including applicant's age, disability, and rehabilitation prospects. Comparison to co-offender's sentences did not support reduction as the offences differed.

Parties
Applicant: Paul Shaun Harrison; Respondent: Regina
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
09 May 2002
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal and Determination
Outcome
leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Severity of Sentence, Special Circumstances, Rehabilitation
Criminal Law Sentencing Severity of Sentence Special Circumstances Rehabilitation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Paul Shaun Harrison

Applicant

Regina

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal and Determination

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether sentences imposed were excessive
  2. 2 Whether sentences should be reduced on grounds of special circumstances, young age, and first adult custodial term
  3. 3 Comparison to co-offender's sentence

Ratio Decidendi

The sentences imposed were within discretionary limits and not excessive, given the gravity of the offences and the circumstances taken into account, including applicant's age, disability, and rehabilitation prospects. Comparison to co-offender's sentences did not support reduction as the offences differed.

Court Disposition

leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed

Orders

  • leave to appeal granted
  • appeal dismissed