COLLIER and ANOR v BURN and ORS [1994] NSWCA 53
There was no evidence that the affidavits read by Mr Burn were false or otherwise objectionable, nor any evidence that Mr Burn knowingly participated in, or was involved in, any breach of a court undertaking. The case against him disclosed no cause of action in contempt.
- Parties
- Claimant: Robert Collier; Claimant: Marion Collier; Respondent: Paul Sheridan Sengos; Respondent: Domenico Mosca; Respondent: John Burn
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 July 1994
- Procedural Posture
- Summons for Contempt of Court / Motion to Strike Out Summons Against Mr John Burn
- Outcome
- Summons against Mr Burn dismissed; costs awarded to Mr Burn.
- Legal Topics
- Motion to Strike Out, False Affidavit, Breach of Undertaking, Barrister's Duties, Due Administration of Justice
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Robert Collier
Claimant
Marion Collier
Claimant
Paul Sheridan Sengos
Respondent
Domenico Mosca
Respondent
John Burn
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Summons for Contempt of Court / Motion to Strike Out Summons Against Mr John Burn
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr John Burn, barrister, committed contempt of court by reading allegedly false or objectionable affidavits in breach of a client's undertaking to the Court.
Ratio Decidendi
There was no evidence that the affidavits read by Mr Burn were false or otherwise objectionable, nor any evidence that Mr Burn knowingly participated in, or was involved in, any breach of a court undertaking. The case against him disclosed no cause of action in contempt.
Court Disposition
Summons against Mr Burn dismissed; costs awarded to Mr Burn.
Orders
- The name of Mr John Burn is removed from the summons brought by Mr and Mrs Collier against Mr Paul Sheridan Sengos and Mr Domenico Mosca.
- The three charges brought by Mr and Mrs Collier against Mr Burn are struck out of the summons.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment