Butt v The Owners - Strata Plan No 71715 [2023] NSWCATCD 138
The Tribunal dismissed the application because the orders sought were misconceived, outside the Tribunal’s powers under s 232 of the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW), or incapable of implementation, particularly where the subject matter (transformer room) was not common property. Further, the relief sought was largely pre-emptive rather than a resolution of a present dispute within the Tribunal’s statutory remit. The use of applicant’s vibrating bed and chair did not justify the orders and, in the absence of a demonstrated nuisance or breach, no further Tribunal intervention was warranted.
- Parties
- Applicant: Paul Thomas Butt; First Respondent: The Owners - Strata Plan No 71715; Second Respondent: John O'Donnell
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 October 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Application / Final Decision
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Strata Scheme Disputes, Noise Nuisance, Management of Strata Property, Tribunal Jurisdiction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Paul Thomas Butt
Applicant
The Owners - Strata Plan No 71715
First Respondent
John O'Donnell
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application / Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal has power under s 232 of the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW) to make the orders sought by the applicant
- 2 Whether the Owners Corporation failed to fulfil its management obligations under the SSMA in relation to noise complaints
- 3 Whether the applicant's use of vibrating bed and chair constituted a nuisance or breach of strata by-laws
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal dismissed the application because the orders sought were misconceived, outside the Tribunal’s powers under s 232 of the Strata Schemes Management Act 2015 (NSW), or incapable of implementation, particularly where the subject matter (transformer room) was not common property. Further, the relief sought was largely pre-emptive rather than a resolution of a present dispute within the Tribunal’s statutory remit. The use of applicant’s vibrating bed and chair did not justify the orders and, in the absence of a demonstrated nuisance or breach, no further Tribunal intervention was warranted.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application is dismissed.
- Costs are reserved.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment