Re Sergeant, John Muckersie & Anor Wheeler, Paulette Maree & Ors v Sergeant, John Muckersie & Ors [1978] FCA 123
The composition is void because it was not accepted at properly convened and distinct meetings for each debtor as required under s.204 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966. A single meeting and resolution for both debtors and joint and several creditors does not satisfy the statutory requirements.
- Parties
- Applicant: Paulette Maree Wheeler; Applicant: Jesse Arto; Applicant: Doreen Clare Arto; Debtor/respondent: John Muckersie Sergeant; Debtor/respondent: Zena Joy Sergeant; Trustee/respondent: John Craven Barnes
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 December 1978
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy / Application to Declare Composition Void
- Outcome
- composition declared void
- Legal Topics
- Composition, Meeting of Creditors, Procedural Irregularity
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Paulette Maree Wheeler
Applicant
Jesse Arto
Applicant
Doreen Clare Arto
Applicant
John Muckersie Sergeant
Debtor/respondent
Zena Joy Sergeant
Debtor/respondent
John Craven Barnes
Trustee/respondent
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy / Application to Declare Composition Void
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the composition made by John Muckersie Sergeant and Zena Joy Sergeant on 8 August 1978 is void due to procedural irregularities at the creditors' meeting under Bankruptcy Act 1966 s.204.
Ratio Decidendi
The composition is void because it was not accepted at properly convened and distinct meetings for each debtor as required under s.204 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966. A single meeting and resolution for both debtors and joint and several creditors does not satisfy the statutory requirements.
Court Disposition
composition declared void
Orders
- The composition made by John Muckersie Sergeant and Zena Joy Sergeant on 8 August 1978 is declared void on the grounds specified in paragraph 1.(i) and (ii) of the application.
- The costs of the applicants, of and incidental to the application, including the reserved costs of the hearing of 14 September 1978, are to be paid by the respondent John Craven Barnes, such costs to be taxed if not agreed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment