PRELEA v WESTPAC BANKING CORPORATION; WESTPAC BANKING CORPORATION v PRELEA [1992] NSWCA 189

PRELEA v WESTPAC BANKING CORPORATION; WESTPAC BANKING CORPORATION v PRELEA [1992] NSWCA 189

The Court held that a slip occurred in Cole J’s orders by failing to treat Mr Prelea’s Contracts Review Act defence as preserved for trial. The judgment entered by the bank against Mr Prelea was set aside, and the issues under the Contracts Review Act for both Mr and Mrs Prelea returned to the Commercial Division for trial. The order granting leave to enter judgment was interlocutory, thus no appeal lay as of right. Costs followed the normal course, not on an indemnity basis, in light of conduct by both sides.

Parties
Appellant/cross Respondent/defendant: George Prelea; Defendant: Paulette Prelea; Third Cross Claimant: Prelea Investments Pty Ltd; Respondent/cross Appellant/plaintiff: Westpac Banking Corporation; Cross Defendant: Australian Guarantee Corporation Limited (AGC)
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
03 July 1992
Procedural Posture
Appeal and Cross Appeal (practice and Procedure) / Interlocutory and Final Orders—court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal and Cross Appeal
Outcome
Cross-appeal allowed; judgment against Mr Prelea set aside; issues under Contracts Review Act remitted for trial; original notice of appeal by Mr Prelea struck out; extension of time granted for second notice of appeal; remaining issues in appeal stood over for later hearing; costs ordered as per standard practice.
Legal Topics
Slip Rule Jurisdiction, Striking Out Defence, Interlocutory and Final Orders, Contracts Review Act 1980, Summary Judgment, Costs of Interlocutory Appeals
Practice and Procedure Contracts Banking and Finance Slip Rule Jurisdiction Striking Out Defence Interlocutory and Final Orders Contracts Review Act 1980 Summary Judgment +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

George Prelea

Appellant/cross Respondent/defendant

Paulette Prelea

Defendant

Prelea Investments Pty Ltd

Third Cross Claimant

Westpac Banking Corporation

Respondent/cross Appellant/plaintiff

Australian Guarantee Corporation Limited (AGC)

Cross Defendant

Procedural Posture

Appeal and Cross Appeal (practice and Procedure) / Interlocutory and Final Orders—court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal and Cross Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a slip occurred in the orders of Cole J relating to the Contracts Review Act defence
  2. 2 Whether judgment against Mr Prelea should be set aside to allow trial of his Contracts Review Act defence
  3. 3 Whether order granting leave to enter judgment is interlocutory or final

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that a slip occurred in Cole J’s orders by failing to treat Mr Prelea’s Contracts Review Act defence as preserved for trial. The judgment entered by the bank against Mr Prelea was set aside, and the issues under the Contracts Review Act for both Mr and Mrs Prelea returned to the Commercial Division for trial. The order granting leave to enter judgment was interlocutory, thus no appeal lay as of right. Costs followed the normal course, not on an indemnity basis, in light of conduct by both sides.

Court Disposition

Cross-appeal allowed; judgment against Mr Prelea set aside; issues under Contracts Review Act remitted for trial; original notice of appeal by Mr Prelea struck out; extension of time granted for second notice of appeal; remaining issues in appeal stood over for later hearing; costs ordered as per standard practice.

Orders

  • Cross-appeal allowed
  • Set aside the judgment entered on 8 May 1992 against George Prelea