Moimoi v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 198
As the constitutional arguments to be raised by the amendment to the notice of appeal were held to have no substance in a related appeal, the application to amend is futile and should be refused; in consequence, the appeal should be dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 March 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- []
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether constitutional arguments raised in Tuitupou v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs apply to this appeal' 'Whether the appellant should be permitted to amend his notice of appeal to raise these issues']
Ratio Decidendi
As the constitutional arguments to be raised by the amendment to the notice of appeal were held to have no substance in a related appeal, the application to amend is futile and should be refused; in consequence, the appeal should be dismissed.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['The appeal be dismissed.' "The appellant pay the respondent's costs."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment