Payce Properties v BBC Hardware [1999] NSWSC 968

Payce Properties v BBC Hardware [1999] NSWSC 968

On construction of the lease and deed, the rent review valuations were not required to be based on the restricted use (timber yard) but rather on the fee simple at highest and best use lawful at the relevant time. The first valuation was not required to be determined during the year ending 28 February 1996; and time was not of the essence. The plaintiff is entitled to the arrears claimed.

Parties
Plaintiff: Payce Properties Pty Limited; Defendant: BBC Hardware Limited
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
24 September 1999
Procedural Posture
Civil / Trial Decision
Outcome
Judgment for the plaintiff. Short minutes of order to be brought in.
Legal Topics
Landlord and Tenant, Rent Review Clauses, Lease Interpretation, Evidence – Admissibility of Surrounding Circumstances
Property Law Contract Law Landlord and Tenant Rent Review Clauses Lease Interpretation Evidence – Admissibility of Surrounding Circumstances

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 21 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Payce Properties Pty Limited

Plaintiff

BBC Hardware Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Trial Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the 1996 valuation was determined in accordance with the requirements of the lease
  2. 2 Whether a valuation for rent review purposes must be conducted on the basis of the premises' current permitted use (timber yard) or at highest and best use
  3. 3 Whether time was of the essence for the valuation required under the rent review clause

Ratio Decidendi

On construction of the lease and deed, the rent review valuations were not required to be based on the restricted use (timber yard) but rather on the fee simple at highest and best use lawful at the relevant time. The first valuation was not required to be determined during the year ending 28 February 1996; and time was not of the essence. The plaintiff is entitled to the arrears claimed.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the plaintiff. Short minutes of order to be brought in.