PD Consultants Pty Limited v Leonard Childs & Anor [2004] NSWSC 1076
The application failed because the plaintiff had not satisfied the Court, within s 88K(2)(c) of the Conveyancing Act 1919, that all reasonable attempts had been made to obtain the option two easement now contended for or an easement having the same effect.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 November 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under S 88 K of the Conveyancing Act 1919 to Impose an Easement / Judgment After Hearing
- Outcome
- Application dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['easements' 'imposition of Easement' 'electricity Transmission Lines' 'reasonable Attempts to Reach Agreement' 'conveyancing Act 1919 S 88 K']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Under S 88 K of the Conveyancing Act 1919 to Impose an Easement / Judgment After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether an easement should be imposed over the defendants' land under s 88K of the Conveyancing Act 1919 for electricity transmission lines and associated equipment." 'Whether the plaintiff had made all reasonable attempts to obtain the easement contended for, or an easement having the same effect, within s 88K(2)(c).' "Whether the proposed easement was reasonably necessary for the effective use or development of the plaintiff's land within s 88K(1)."]
Ratio Decidendi
The application failed because the plaintiff had not satisfied the Court, within s 88K(2)(c) of the Conveyancing Act 1919, that all reasonable attempts had been made to obtain the option two easement now contended for or an easement having the same effect.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed.
Orders
- ['Application dismissed.' "The plaintiff must pay the defendants' costs in any event." 'The matter was adjourned until 31 January 2005 at 9.30am for directions.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment