PEDEN v DANE [1997] NSWCA 245

PEDEN v DANE [1997] NSWCA 245

No basis was shown of any miscarriage or error in Judge Hughes' exercise of discretion regarding the costs order; thus, leave to appeal and extension of time were refused.

Parties
Applicant: Peden; Respondent: Dane
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
23 June 1997
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Leave to Appeal Against Costs Order
Outcome
Application refused with costs.
Legal Topics
Costs, Extension of Time, Leave to Appeal
Civil Procedure Costs Extension of Time Leave to Appeal

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Peden

Applicant

Dane

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Leave to Appeal Against Costs Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether leave to appeal and extension of time should be granted to challenge the costs order made by Judge Hughes
  2. 2 Whether there was any error or miscarriage in Judge Hughes' exercise of discretion regarding costs

Ratio Decidendi

No basis was shown of any miscarriage or error in Judge Hughes' exercise of discretion regarding the costs order; thus, leave to appeal and extension of time were refused.

Court Disposition

Application refused with costs.

Orders

  • Application refused with costs.