REGINA v. PELL [2004] NSWCCA 205
The trial judge erred by imposing a sentence for one count that reflected the total criminality of all offences, contrary to authority. The aggregate sentence was excessive given the applicant's circumstances, and the appellate court must intervene to re-sentence appropriately, recognising special circumstances and the seriousness of each count.
- Parties
- Respondent: Regina; Appellant: Pell
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 April 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed. Sentences quashed. Appellant re-sentenced on each count with specified terms.
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Indecent Assault, Special Circumstances, Re Sentencing, Excessive Sentence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Respondent
Pell
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed was excessive
- 2 Whether the trial judge erred by not applying special circumstances under s.44 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act (NSW) 1999
- 3 Whether the sentence structure improperly reflected the criminality of the individual offences
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge erred by imposing a sentence for one count that reflected the total criminality of all offences, contrary to authority. The aggregate sentence was excessive given the applicant's circumstances, and the appellate court must intervene to re-sentence appropriately, recognising special circumstances and the seriousness of each count.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed. Sentences quashed. Appellant re-sentenced on each count with specified terms.
Orders
- Grant leave to appeal.
- Appeal allowed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment