Weedon v Davidson [1907] HCA 2
The High Court held that the transfer of powers under 6 Vict. No. 7 sec. 71 from Commissioners to the Melbourne City Council necessarily carried with it the incident of statutory exclusivity and penalty for selling outside designated markets, making the Council's appointed markets subject to the same legal incidents as if appointed by Commissioners. Consequently, selling marketable commodities in Melbourne outside market places appointed by the Council is a punishable offence under sec. 25 of the Markets Act 1890.
- Parties
- Appellant, Informant: Henry Weedon; Respondent, Defendant: Maurice Davidson
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 March 1907
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Appeal From the Supreme Court of Victoria
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Penalty for Selling Outside Markets, Transfer of Powers From Commissioners to Council, Exclusive Market Rights, Statutory Monopoly
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Henry Weedon
Appellant, Informant
Maurice Davidson
Respondent, Defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal From the Supreme Court of Victoria
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the prohibition under sec. 25 of the Markets Act 1890 apply in Melbourne where markets were appointed by the Council, not Commissioners?
- 2 Did the transfer of powers from Commissioners to the City Council include the authority to enforce penalties for sales outside market places?
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court held that the transfer of powers under 6 Vict. No. 7 sec. 71 from Commissioners to the Melbourne City Council necessarily carried with it the incident of statutory exclusivity and penalty for selling outside designated markets, making the Council's appointed markets subject to the same legal incidents as if appointed by Commissioners. Consequently, selling marketable commodities in Melbourne outside market places appointed by the Council is a punishable offence under sec. 25 of the Markets Act 1890.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Order of Hodges J. reversed.
- Order nisi for review of conviction discharged, with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment