Gao v Citywide Service Solutions Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 388
The Court entered judgment for the Fair Work Ombudsman and awarded costs against the applicant because the only relief sought (an apology) could not have been granted, rendering the proceeding purposeless and vexatious.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 April 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Application / Orders Following Discontinuance; Reasons for Previous Orders Requested
- Outcome
- Proceedings against the Fair Work Ombudsman discontinued; judgment for the Fair Work Ombudsman; applicant to pay Fair Work Ombudsman's costs; extension of time for possible leave to appeal granted
- Legal Topics
- ['discontinuance of Proceedings' 'vexatious Proceedings' 'judicial Review Grounds' 'remedies Under Fair Work Act']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Application / Orders Following Discontinuance; Reasons for Previous Orders Requested
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Court can grant relief (an apology) against the Fair Work Ombudsman as sought by the applicant' 'Whether the proceeding against the Fair Work Ombudsman was vexatiously brought' 'Whether discretion should be exercised to grant an extension of time for appeal']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court entered judgment for the Fair Work Ombudsman and awarded costs against the applicant because the only relief sought (an apology) could not have been granted, rendering the proceeding purposeless and vexatious.
Court Disposition
Proceedings against the Fair Work Ombudsman discontinued; judgment for the Fair Work Ombudsman; applicant to pay Fair Work Ombudsman's costs; extension of time for possible leave to appeal granted
Orders
- ['The Commonwealth Ombudsman removed as respondent.' 'Judgment for the Fair Work Ombudsman.' "Applicant to pay the Fair Work Ombudsman's costs including reserved costs." 'Applicant granted extension of time until 17 May 2013 to apply for leave to appeal from orders 2 and 3.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment