Peninsula Balmain Pty. Limited v. Abigroup Contractors Pty. Limited [2002] NSWCA 270
Clause 40.5 of the contract, requiring reasonable rates or prices for valuation of variations including delay costs, is inconsistent with and therefore prevails over the quantification of delay costs in the Tender by virtue of the formal instrument of agreement; thus, Order 3(b) was deleted, and no change was made...
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 August 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Contract Appeal / Supplementary Judgment on Orders
- Outcome
- Order 3(b) made on 3 July 2002 deleted. No change to costs order (Order 5).
- Legal Topics
- ['contract Interpretation' 'order for Costs' 'precedence of Contract Documents' 'delay Costs Quantification']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Contract Appeal / Supplementary Judgment on Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether General Conditions prevail over Tender terms regarding delay costs' 'Whether clause 40.5 of the contract displaces quantification in the Tender' 'Whether Peninsula should be deprived of any costs over unsuccessful issues']
Ratio Decidendi
Clause 40.5 of the contract, requiring reasonable rates or prices for valuation of variations including delay costs, is inconsistent with and therefore prevails over the quantification of delay costs in the Tender by virtue of the formal instrument of agreement; thus, Order 3(b) was deleted, and no change was made to Order 5 (costs).
Court Disposition
Order 3(b) made on 3 July 2002 deleted. No change to costs order (Order 5).
Orders
- ['Order 3(b) made on 3 July 2002 deleted.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment