Agostino v Penrith City Council [2021] NSWLEC 1399
The unauthorised addition to the shop required planning approval under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and was erected without such approval; the circumstances exist for issuing an amended demolish works order, and the Court has power under s 8.18(4) EPA Act to modify the Order as agreed by the parties.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 July 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld
- Legal Topics
- ['development Control Order' 'unauthorised Works' 'modification of Orders' 'land Use Consent']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the unauthorised addition to the shop required development consent' 'Whether the Order for demolition was correctly issued' 'Whether the Court had power to modify the Order as agreed by the parties' 'Whether the circumstances for issuing a demolish works order exist']
Ratio Decidendi
The unauthorised addition to the shop required planning approval under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and was erected without such approval; the circumstances exist for issuing an amended demolish works order, and the Court has power under s 8.18(4) EPA Act to modify the Order as agreed by the parties.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld
Orders
- ['The Appeal is upheld.' 'The Development Control Order dated 16 October 2019 is modified to require demolition of the unauthorised addition by 29 October 2021 in accordance with the Studio Block plans and photographs.' 'The First Applicant must ensure that no person erect signage or display specified items for sale...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment