People with Disability Australia Inc v Minister for Disability Services [2009] NSWADT 259

Leave to proceed out of time is granted as a reasonable explanation for the delay exists, and PWD has demonstrated genuine concern with the subject-matter, conferring standing under s 29(1) of the Community Services Act.

Source-derived case information.

Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 02 October 2009
Procedural Posture: Application for Review of Administrative Decision / Preliminary Hearing on Leave to Proceed Out of Time and Standing
Outcome: Leave granted for out of time application; standing conferred
Legal Topics: ['standing' 'late Application' 'review of Administrative Decisions']

['administrative Law' 'disability Law'] ['standing' 'late Application' 'review of Administrative Decisions']

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Procedural Posture

Application for Review of Administrative Decision / Preliminary Hearing on Leave to Proceed Out of Time and Standing

Legal Issues

1 ['Whether leave should be granted for the application to proceed out of time' 'Whether People with Disability Australia has standing to bring the application for review']

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Leave granted for out of time application; standing conferred

Orders

["Leave is granted for the application for review of the Minister's decision deemed to have been made on 5 June 2008 to be made out of time." "PWD has standing to bring the application for review of the Minister's decision deemed to have been made on 5 June 2008."]

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.