Weinrauch v Martin [2013] NSWSC 1305
Because the parties had agreed consent orders intended to finally resolve the dispute, and those orders accorded with the requirements of s 56 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005, the Court made the orders by consent.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 September 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Proceedings for Possession of Property / Consent Orders
- Outcome
- Orders made in terms of the consent orders filed in Court marked MFI 1.
- Legal Topics
- ['possession of Property' 'consent Orders' 'sale of Property' 'just, Quick and Cheap Resolution of Proceedings']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Proceedings for Possession of Property / Consent Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Court should make the consent orders agreed by the parties for possession of the property and its sale.' 'Whether making the agreed orders accorded with s 56 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the parties had agreed consent orders intended to finally resolve the dispute, and those orders accorded with the requirements of s 56 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005, the Court made the orders by consent.
Court Disposition
Orders made in terms of the consent orders filed in Court marked MFI 1.
Orders
- ['By consent, orders made in terms of the consent orders filed in Court on 10 September 2013 marked MFI 1.' 'The consent orders provided for the defendant giving the plaintiff possession of the property.' 'The consent orders provided for a regime for the sale of the property by private treaty or auction,...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment