Perilya Broken Hill Limited v Valuer-General [2012] NSWLEC 235
The unimproved value must include land improvements such as excavations and shafts, exclude mining equipment, and is properly determined by the present value of a 4% royalty stream based on after-tax profits of mine operations, accounting for relevant costs, a two-year start-up period, and a discount rate of 25%.
- Parties
- Applicant: Perilya Broken Hill Limited; Respondent: Valuer-General
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 October 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; Valuer-General's determination revoked; value as at 1 July 2007 set at $4,900,000.
- Legal Topics
- Unimproved Value, Discounted Cash Flow, Royalty Calculation, Business Valuation, Valuation of Land Act 1916
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Perilya Broken Hill Limited
Applicant
Valuer-General
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the unimproved value of the property used for mining under the Valuation of Land Act 1916 as at 1 July 2007?
- 2 How should the royalty for the landowner be calculated (before or after tax)?
Ratio Decidendi
The unimproved value must include land improvements such as excavations and shafts, exclude mining equipment, and is properly determined by the present value of a 4% royalty stream based on after-tax profits of mine operations, accounting for relevant costs, a two-year start-up period, and a discount rate of 25%.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; Valuer-General's determination revoked; value as at 1 July 2007 set at $4,900,000.
Orders
- The appeal is allowed.
- The determination of the Valuer-General is revoked.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment