Permanent Mortgages Pty Ltd v Autore [2014] NSWSC 1204

A short stay of the writ is justified given persuasive evidence of imminent refinancing and Mr Autore's undertaking to continue monthly payments until mortgage discharge, balancing lender's right to security with practical benefits of refinance.

Source-derived case information.

Parties: Plaintiff: Permanent Mortgages Pty Ltd; Defendant: Regina Francis Autore
Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 26 August 2014
Procedural Posture: Interlocutory Application / Application for Stay of Writ of Possession
Outcome: Stay granted upon undertaking to pay monthly; costs in the cause.
Legal Topics: Stay of Writ of Possession, Mortgage Enforcement, Refinancing Arrangements

Property Law Stay of Writ of Possession Mortgage Enforcement Refinancing Arrangements

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5

Parties

Permanent Mortgages Pty Ltd

Plaintiff

Regina Francis Autore

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Interlocutory Application / Application for Stay of Writ of Possession

Legal Issues

1 Whether a short stay of the writ of possession should be granted in light of imminent refinancing and ongoing monthly payments

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Stay granted upon undertaking to pay monthly; costs in the cause.

Orders

Upon the undertaking of Anthony Autore to continue to pay the plaintiff the sum of $6,500 per month until full discharge of the plaintiff's mortgage, the writ of possession issued on 14th July 2014 is stayed until 5 p.m. 5th September 2014.
The costs of today are the plaintiff's costs in the cause.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.