Permanent Trustee Co Ltd & anor. v Keogh & ors. [1999] NSWSC 967
The Court declined to adopt the Referee's report because, after reviewing the evidence and objections, it was satisfied there were errors in the report's treatment of disclosure and misrepresentation in the insurance proposal (particularly regarding question 4.3); and the finding of waiver by H.I.H of disclosure in...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Permanent Trustee Company Limited; Plaintiff: Moreland Finance Corporation (Vic) Pty Limited; Defendants: Allan Andrew Keogh & ors; Defendants: Valuers (including Mr. Rowan); Cross Claim Respondent: H.I.H. Casualty and General Insurance Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 September 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Common Law / Motion for Adoption of Referee's Report
- Outcome
- Declined to adopt the Referee's report
- Legal Topics
- Negligence Professional Indemnity Insurance, Non Disclosure and Misrepresentation in Insurance Proposals, Adoption/rejection of Referee Report Under SCR Part 72
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Permanent Trustee Company Limited
Plaintiff
Moreland Finance Corporation (Vic) Pty Limited
Plaintiff
Allan Andrew Keogh & ors
Defendants
Valuers (including Mr. Rowan)
Defendants
H.I.H. Casualty and General Insurance Limited
Cross Claim Respondent
Procedural Posture
Common Law / Motion for Adoption of Referee's Report
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there was non-disclosure or misrepresentation by valuers entitling H.I.H to reduce liability under the contract to nil
- 2 Whether H.I.H is obliged to indemnify valuers in respect of the claim made against them by the plaintiffs
- 3 Whether the Court should adopt the Referee's report under SCR Part 72
Ratio Decidendi
The Court declined to adopt the Referee's report because, after reviewing the evidence and objections, it was satisfied there were errors in the report's treatment of disclosure and misrepresentation in the insurance proposal (particularly regarding question 4.3); and the finding of waiver by H.I.H of disclosure in relation to question 4.3 was not supported on the evidence. Thus, adoption would not be a proper exercise of discretion under SCR Pt 72.
Court Disposition
Declined to adopt the Referee's report
Orders
- Plaintiffs to file and serve Short Minutes of Orders within 7 days to give effect to the judgment and its practical consequences.
- Fourth to seventh defendants and H.I.H to file and serve any written submissions on proposed or alternative orders within 7 days thereafter.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment