R v FORREST, Kerry [2013] NSWSC 527
The accused's serious illness and poor prognosis, while significant, did not amount to the exceptional circumstances required for a permanent stay. The evidence did not establish an inability to participate in or instruct for her own defence sufficient to warrant a stay. Fair trial concerns could be managed by trial measures such as reduced sitting hours and appropriate jury directions. The balance of public interest favoured proceeding to trial on a most serious charge.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 May 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Interlocutory Application for Permanent Stay of Trial
- Outcome
- application for permanent stay refused
- Legal Topics
- ['permanent Stay of Proceedings' 'fair Trial' "accused's Medical Condition" 'abuse of Process']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Interlocutory Application for Permanent Stay of Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the accused's serious illness and medical prognosis justify a permanent stay of proceedings for murder" "Whether the accused's medical and mental condition prevents a fair trial"]
Ratio Decidendi
The accused's serious illness and poor prognosis, while significant, did not amount to the exceptional circumstances required for a permanent stay. The evidence did not establish an inability to participate in or instruct for her own defence sufficient to warrant a stay. Fair trial concerns could be managed by trial measures such as reduced sitting hours and appropriate jury directions. The balance of public interest favoured proceeding to trial on a most serious charge.
Court Disposition
application for permanent stay refused
Orders
- ['Application for permanent stay refused.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment