Samuel Smith & Son Pty Ltd v Pernod Ricard Winemakers Pty Ltd [2016] FCA 1515
While BAROSSA SIGNATURE was used by Pernod Ricard as a trade mark, it is not deceptively similar to THE SIGNATURE. The unusual combination of descriptive words, trade context, and distinctive features prevent a likelihood of consumer confusion. Yalumba's application is dismissed because the impugned sign is not deceptively similar to the registered mark.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 December 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Trade Mark Infringement Proceedings / Judgment Following Trial
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['trade Marks' 'trade Mark Infringement' 'use as a Trade Mark' 'deceptive Similarity' 'defence—descriptive Use' 'good Faith' 'sub Brands in Wine Industry']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Trade Mark Infringement Proceedings / Judgment Following Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the respondent used the words BAROSSA SIGNATURE as a trade mark' 'Whether BAROSSA SIGNATURE is deceptively similar to THE SIGNATURE (the Yalumba Mark)' "Whether the respondent's use was in good faith under s 122(1)(b) of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth)"]
Ratio Decidendi
While BAROSSA SIGNATURE was used by Pernod Ricard as a trade mark, it is not deceptively similar to THE SIGNATURE. The unusual combination of descriptive words, trade context, and distinctive features prevent a likelihood of consumer confusion. Yalumba's application is dismissed because the impugned sign is not deceptively similar to the registered mark.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- ['1. The application is dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment