Perpetual Nominees Limited v Catherine Margaret Francis [2011] NSWSC 56

Perpetual Nominees Limited v Catherine Margaret Francis [2011] NSWSC 56

There was no triable issue regarding the escrow agreement for consent judgment; the plaintiff was entitled to orders for possession and judgment for the debt, with orders taking account of potential hardship by deferring enforcement until settlement deadline passed.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
18 February 2011
Procedural Posture
Supreme Court Procedure Summary Judgment / Judgment After Hearing and Submissions; Summary Judgment Considered and Entered Contingent on Settlement Delay
Outcome
Conditional summary judgment in favour of plaintiff, orders for possession and payment to take effect if sale not settled by specified date, leave granted for writ of possession, no order as to costs, liberty to apply granted.
Legal Topics
['mortgage Enforcement' 'summary Judgment' 'possession Proceedings' 'real Property Sales' 'escrow Arrangements']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Supreme Court Procedure Summary Judgment / Judgment After Hearing and Submissions; Summary Judgment Considered and Entered Contingent on Settlement Delay

  1. 1 ['Whether there was a triable issue regarding escrow terms of the consent judgment' 'Whether summary judgment and orders for possession should be made given alleged hardship and possible technical notice deficiencies']

Ratio Decidendi

There was no triable issue regarding the escrow agreement for consent judgment; the plaintiff was entitled to orders for possession and judgment for the debt, with orders taking account of potential hardship by deferring enforcement until settlement deadline passed.

Court Disposition

Conditional summary judgment in favour of plaintiff, orders for possession and payment to take effect if sale not settled by specified date, leave granted for writ of possession, no order as to costs, liberty to apply granted.

Orders

  • ['In the event that the contract for sale of properties (as specified) has not settled by 5.00pm on 14 March 2011, judgment for the plaintiff for possession of specified properties and $2,147,247.29, interest at $641.76 per day thereafter.' 'Leave granted for writ of possession to issue forthwith.' 'No order as to...