Perpetual Nominees Limited v Catherine Margaret Francis [2011] NSWSC 56
There was no triable issue regarding the escrow agreement for consent judgment; the plaintiff was entitled to orders for possession and judgment for the debt, with orders taking account of potential hardship by deferring enforcement until settlement deadline passed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 February 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Supreme Court Procedure Summary Judgment / Judgment After Hearing and Submissions; Summary Judgment Considered and Entered Contingent on Settlement Delay
- Outcome
- Conditional summary judgment in favour of plaintiff, orders for possession and payment to take effect if sale not settled by specified date, leave granted for writ of possession, no order as to costs, liberty to apply granted.
- Legal Topics
- ['mortgage Enforcement' 'summary Judgment' 'possession Proceedings' 'real Property Sales' 'escrow Arrangements']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Supreme Court Procedure Summary Judgment / Judgment After Hearing and Submissions; Summary Judgment Considered and Entered Contingent on Settlement Delay
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether there was a triable issue regarding escrow terms of the consent judgment' 'Whether summary judgment and orders for possession should be made given alleged hardship and possible technical notice deficiencies']
Ratio Decidendi
There was no triable issue regarding the escrow agreement for consent judgment; the plaintiff was entitled to orders for possession and judgment for the debt, with orders taking account of potential hardship by deferring enforcement until settlement deadline passed.
Court Disposition
Conditional summary judgment in favour of plaintiff, orders for possession and payment to take effect if sale not settled by specified date, leave granted for writ of possession, no order as to costs, liberty to apply granted.
Orders
- ['In the event that the contract for sale of properties (as specified) has not settled by 5.00pm on 14 March 2011, judgment for the plaintiff for possession of specified properties and $2,147,247.29, interest at $641.76 per day thereafter.' 'Leave granted for writ of possession to issue forthwith.' 'No order as to...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment