PERPETUAL TRUSTEE Co Ltd v CROOKS MICHELL PEACOCK STEWART Pty Ltd [1992] NSWCA 184
The majority held that the declarations should clarify that references in the disputed clause concern specific defined terms and that certain prohibitions apply only to open market rental determination, not to comparable premises; therefore, the appeal is dismissed with variation of Brownie J’s declarations for greater clarity.
- Parties
- Appellant: Perpetual Trustee Co Ltd; First Respondent: Crooks Michell Peacock Stewart Pty Ltd; Second Respondent: Second Respondent
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 October 1992
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed with variation of declarations
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of Lease Clauses, Form of Orders, Market Rental Determination
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Perpetual Trustee Co Ltd
Appellant
Crooks Michell Peacock Stewart Pty Ltd
First Respondent
Second Respondent
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether appeal should be dismissed or declarations regarding clause interpretation made
- 2 Proper interpretation of CL4.5.8 in sublease dated 28 February 1990
Ratio Decidendi
The majority held that the declarations should clarify that references in the disputed clause concern specific defined terms and that certain prohibitions apply only to open market rental determination, not to comparable premises; therefore, the appeal is dismissed with variation of Brownie J’s declarations for greater clarity.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed with variation of declarations
Orders
- Appeal dismissed, subject only to variation of the declarations made by Brownie J.
- In lieu of the declarations of Brownie J dated 12 March 1992, declare specific construction of CL4.5.8 as described.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment