Perpetual Trustee Company Limited v Orr [1907] HCA 15

Perpetual Trustee Company Limited v Orr [1907] HCA 15

The facts alleged by the plaintiffs did not entitle them to an unconditional injunction preventing the deduction or apportionment of rent following eviction by title paramount. Even accepting the existence of a preferential right to lease under the Crown Lands Act, equity would not grant an absolute injunction absent indemnity or a new contract. The replication was thus bad and could not prevent the consequences of eviction or a partial abatement of rent.

Parties
Appellant: Perpetual Trustee Company Limited; Respondent: Orr and Others
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
17 May 1907
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal From Supreme Court of New South Wales, on Demurrer to an Equitable Replication
Outcome
appeal dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Rent Apportionment, Eviction by Title Paramount, Crown Lands, Preferential Rights to Lease, Restrictive Covenants
Property Law Landlord and Tenant Rent Apportionment Eviction by Title Paramount Crown Lands Preferential Rights to Lease Restrictive Covenants

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 17 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Perpetual Trustee Company Limited

Appellant

Orr and Others

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Appeal From Supreme Court of New South Wales, on Demurrer to an Equitable Replication

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiffs' equitable replication prevents the deduction of rent after eviction by title paramount from part of the demised land
  2. 2 Whether plaintiffs had a preferential right under Crown Lands Act to lease the land reserved to the Crown
  3. 3 Whether the defendants, having obtained a lease of the strip from the Crown, held it in a fiduciary or quasi-fiduciary capacity for the plaintiffs

Ratio Decidendi

The facts alleged by the plaintiffs did not entitle them to an unconditional injunction preventing the deduction or apportionment of rent following eviction by title paramount. Even accepting the existence of a preferential right to lease under the Crown Lands Act, equity would not grant an absolute injunction absent indemnity or a new contract. The replication was thus bad and could not prevent the consequences of eviction or a partial abatement of rent.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs